Saturday, December 20, 2008

WHY JOURNALISTS ARE THROWING SHOES


Among the many crimes of propriety committed by Iraqi television journalist Muntadar al-Zaidi’s, who threw his shoes at President Bush during his surprise visit to Iraq, is al-Zaidi’s lack of journalistic objectivity. His disrespectful act clearly reveals a bias against Bush, which we expect will compromise the objectivity of his journalism.

It seems, however, that al-Zaidi is not alone in the new swarm of journalists who are throwing shoes.
More...
Aside from the journalists who convert to the blogging world, is a new era of readers who expect notions of objectivity are going to be left behind.

Political blogger Andrew Sullivan in his article “Why I blog” says the blog is the “spontaneous expression of instant thought—impermanent beyond even the ephemera of daily journalism. It is accountable in the immediate and unavoidable ways to readers and other bloggers…” As more readers shift to niche sources of news and opinion that are tailored to their particular ideologies, it seems like readers are no longer expecting or commending the objective journalist.

The Huffington Post serves as a case in point of a news source that wears its bias on its sleeve. It seeks to provide “transparency, accountability, and community.” Unlike major news sources, however, it does not tout a fair and balanced coverage, but renders its biases explicitly clear, providing readers with the grain of salt they need to read with. Ethan Zuckerman contemplates the tradeoffs with the rise of new media, asking,

Should we expect that readers are aware that media has changed and that we should expect every voice to have strong, visible bias? Or does this point to a need to re-learn how to read both online and offline media to understand that we’ve got far more activist media and far less that’s striving for - real or fake - neutrality?

The democratization of information through new forms of news distribution is creating a readership that no longer believes news to be an objective set of facts handed down by impartial robots. Whether the bias is meticulously veiled with notions of impartiality or is worn as a token of pride in editorial blogs, readers have a new awareness of agendas that need to be carefully picked apart.

~SJP

Friday, December 19, 2008

CHANGE WE CAN... COMPETE FOR

&
As Barack Obama prepares to take the highest office in the United States, he has begun to build a team of accomplished and skillful men and women that will help the young president lead America in these most troubled times.

Indeed, America stands at a crossroads in history, and Obama’s star-studded team hopes to answer some of the nation’s most pressing questions. How does America weather the recession? How does the nation withdraw its troops from Iraq? Which Ivy League school is really the best?

Come on. You thought it wouldn’t be a competition?

People have already noted that Obama’s team is noticeably “Ivy-tinged". This, of course, begs the question that burns constantly in the American public mind: Which of the “Ancient Eight” comes out on top?
More...
Yes, perhaps this most crucial question may finally be resolved. But probably not. At least it gives Ivy Leaguers one more thing to compete in that isn’t totally ridiculous. This isn’t your run-of-the-mill U.S. News and World Report ranking. This is real, heavy stuff.

To catch you up to speed, The New York Times provides a snapshot profile of each Obama pick here.

Get out your scorecard, this may be tight. Here are some of the big picks.

Eric Holder (Attorney General): Columbia University, Columbia Law School
Holder, Columbia College ’73, Columbia Law ’76, and a Columbia trustee, seems like a pretty clean guy, not at all like that Alberto Gonza – Oops.

Arne Duncan (Secretary of Education): Harvard College, Harvard Board of Overseers
Arne “Dunk” Duncan ’86 played professional basketball in Australia for a few years before committing himself to education administration. He is, apparently, what your high school phys. ed. teacher was not: successful. Props, Harvard.

Shaun Donovan (Secretary of Housing and Urban Development): Harvard College, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Graduate School of Design at Harvard
Donovan offers “extensive experience with housing issues” after years of working for New York’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development. Yet, despite earning three degrees from Harvard, he doesn’t seem to get any love from The Crimson. A search for “Shaun Donovan” on the daily’s website yields no results, which may help explain the concerning frown he’s sporting (Photo courtesy New York Times).

Hillary Clinton (Secretary of State): Yale Law
Everyone happy now?

Timothy Geithner (Secretary of Treasury): Dartmouth College
Boasting a master’s in international economics and East Asian studies from Johns Hopkins, Geithner seems like a perfect pick with the growing presence of China in the global economy. But it gets better. The Dartmouth reports one of Geithner’s professors as saying, “’he had this wonderful giggle” and “everyone loved him.” Well, I’m sold.

Lawrence Summers (Director of National Economic Council): Ph.D. Harvard, five-year Harvard president
Lawrence Summers appears to be a logical selection for the economic council, having been around the “economic block,” if you will, once or twice before. However, he says stupid things. His propensity to say stupid things may not bode well during a highly televised recession. Fingers crossed, right?

Lisa Jackson (Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency): Master’s, Princeton
I wish I could be more excited about Jackson GS ‘86’s appointment, but it’s a bit tough. Sure, she’s a Princetonian with experience as New Jersey’s chief of staff and its Department of Environmental Protection. But she’s already been heavily criticized. Even worse, she wasn’t appointed to the newly created position that has possibly the greatest title in the U.S. government: climate czarina.

Peter Orszag (Office of Management and Budget Director): Princeton
Orszag ’91 is bomb. Or at least, “He was more or less a model student, really,” Alan frickin’ Blinder said about him. Not to mention that, for such a young guy, he’s already worked in the CBO and Clinton’s National Economic Council. Sounds like a home run for Princeton.

Gregory Craig (White House counsel): Harvard College, Yale Law
Craig is, apparently, two-faced. For one thing, he’s represented in court both a president, Bill Clinton in his impeachment trial, and a president's near-assassin, John W. Hinckley Jr. (the guy who shot President Reagan). Even worse, he went to Yale after graduating from Harvard. Yep, two-faced. …But I guess that’ll make him a good lawyer.

Now, using absolutely no scientific method of weighing these separate positions in this nearly-arbitrary ranking (and assuming these positions are all approved by the Senate), it seems that Harvard wins, with these picks boasting four Harvard degrees and two positions in the university’s leadership. That’s not to mention the fact that the man himself got his J.D. up in Cambridge.

(Damn it, Princeton, we could've done better. Thanks a lot Woody Woo.)

Also notable: Brown, Cornell, and Penn haven’t shown themselves capable of producing an Obama administration-worthy alum, solidifying their status as safety schools. Sorry guys. Maybe next time.

WAS

Thursday, December 18, 2008

IS AN IVY LEAGUE DEGREE WORTH IT?

Capitalizing on the tense economic climate, SmartMoney unveiled its "Best Colleges for Making Money" ranking (slideshow here) yesterday, compiling tuition costs and salaries to find the schools that offer the largest payback, and trying to convince us to transfer to the University of Georgia.
More...
The magazine's ranking calculated the "average payback" ratio of colleges across America by comparing the median salary of graduates to the cost of a degree, effectively seeing how the investment in higher education paid off.

Princeton University came in first out of the Ivy League schools with an "average payback" of 132%. According to the ranking, the median salary of a Princeton graduate is $66,500 after three years and $131,000 after 15 years. The cost of a Princeton degree for the Class of 2005 was $111,840 without financial aid. Fifteen years ago, the Class of 1993 paid $64,150 for their degree, also not including financial aid.

Rounding out the top five Ivy League investments were Dartmouth, in second with an "average payback" of 131%, followed by Yale, Harvard and University of Pennsylvania.

SmartMoney's ranking names University of Georgia the school with the highest "average payback", at 338%.

However, when calculating "returns", SmartMoney's ranking focuses on the ratio of earning power to tuition, not on the actual salary. Though Dartmouth alumni earned the highest median salary fifteen years after graduation, $134,000, Dartmouth did not make the Top 20. The median salary fifteen years after graduation at top-ranked UGA is $86,000.

Unlike other publications, SmartMoney assesses only the return on the investment, as it were, and not the schools' resources or quality of education. The ranking also did not factor in the financial aid provided by many private institutions when calculating the cost of a degree. Only two private schools, Washington and Lee University and Princeton, were included in the Top 20.

For now, we'll be staying put at Princeton, defiantly facing the inevitable declining median salary of our graduates once alumni start trickling out of Wall Street. We like the castles. But what we noticed in this ranking wasn't just who was above whom, but the skyrocketing cost of higher education, which has been on our mind since Tamar Lewin's recent New York Times article was published.

Today, the average cost of attendance for only one year at Princeton is around $49,190, according to the University's website. Tuition for this year, 2008-2009, is $34, 290. That's more than half the cost of four years of a Princeton education from 1989-1993.


Sources:
www.smartmoney.com
www.princeton.edu
www.onlineathens.com

-AW

Monday, December 15, 2008

WHAT'S UP WITH... WEIRD SCULPTURES ON CAMPUS?

Princeton is a university full of mystery, secrets, and questions waiting to be answered. The “What’s Up With…” feature attempts to begin to answer some of those questions. This week: That Wacky Campus Artwork!

Up until about two months ago, Princeton University was blessed by a very large endowment, which allowed the school to purchase an impressive quantity of outdoor sculptures by well-known artists. Unfortunately for the would-be audience of these pieces of art, there appears to be an inverse correlation between the price and/or importance of a sculpture and its artistic accessibility. Here at Drink the Ink, we’re going to try to unravel the mystery of two of Princeton’s more unique works:
The first stop on our tour of campus sculptures falls between Firestone Library and the Chapel. To a quickly passing observer, the statue likely appears graphically sexual; there seems to be one man, on his knees, with his head positioned suggestively near the other man’s private region. Why, one wonders, is this sculpture on campus, next to the chapel no less? Is it a statement on discomfort with homosexuality? Is it a critique of the desensitization of sex in modern culture? The man's hands appear bound - is it some strange advertisement for light bondage?
More...
But a closer look at the statue, and its history, proves that these initial queries could not be farther from the truth.


The statue’s actual name is "Abraham and Isaac: In Memory of May 4, 1970, Kent State University". Kent State commissioned artist George Segal to create a sculpture following the shooting of Vietnam War protesters by the National Guard. In 1979, after Kent State rejected the sculpture, asking for a more literal interpretation, Princeton purchased the sculpture and installed it in its current resting place. The result: a very strange schism between a somber, reflective piece of art and its somewhat juvenile, if understandable, perception on campus.

Fun Fact to Know and Share: Segal was a local artist, living on a chicken farm in South Brunswick, New Jersey, until his death in 2000.


One of the other statues on campus that both draws attention and defies easy explanation is the strange green donut located to the right of Nassau Hall. What’s odd about this statue is how different it looks from each angle. Drink the Ink thought it had solved the mystery when a passerby noticed our curiosity and told us the statue was called “Nixon’s Nose,” bringing us around to an angle at which the statue did indeed resemble the nose of the 37th President. But there was more to this sculpture than that.


VS

The real name of this sculpture is the decidedly less creative "Oval with Points" by acclaimed British artist Sir Henry Moore. And despite the remarkable resemblance to Nixon’s Nose, and the fact that Nixon was indeed in office when the sculpture was installed in 1971, it seems that Moore’s actual inspiration for the piece was an elephant skull his wife and a friend brought back from Africa.


Side Note: We’re not sure if this actually makes Oval with Points any less weird or just sort of explains the methodology behind the weirdness.

Now, we’re sure you’re wondering: what do these two statues have to do with an Army Air Force Pilot shot down during World War II? EVERYTHING! It turns out both these two sculptures, and many of the other artistic oddities around campus, are at Princeton because of the Putnam Collection - someone anonymously donated one million dollars in honor of Lt. John Putnam in order to have famous sculptures on campus.

And now you have a little relief from that mild burning sensation somewhere in the question part of your brain. Don’t thank us: this is why we’re here.

-SKG

Saturday, December 13, 2008

DISPATCH FROM THE FIELD: BEER PONG DIPLOMACY

Every so often a Pressclubber writes an article that – for one reason or another – never sees the light of day in a newspaper. Most of these are quickly forgotten, but some are too good to stay in the dustbin of history.

Here at Drink The Ink we’ll occasionally bring you one of these stories – stories that were just too hot for the Liberal Media to handle, but now have a second chance at life thanks to the magic of the Internet. Enjoy:

Sparkletights threw down the gauntlet earlier this week via Facebook:
“War of 1812. Hockey. Burning DC down the first time.
vs.
Obesity. World’s #1 Superpower.”
Canada vs. US. Saturday night. Pick a side. Be there.

They came, this multinational group of Princeton University freshmen, to a tiny single-occupancy room in a tiny, unassuming dorm on campus. They came for fun. They came for booze. But mostly, they came for pride. This was binge drinking with a purpose.
More...
They came wearing the distinct iconography of their respective tribes: girls wrapped in maple-leaf flags, boys sporting wreaths of red, white, and blue.

The room’s owner, a tall blonde, wore an Indian feather in her hair to signal her non-alignment (neither country, after all, could claim sole exploitation of the continent’s original inhabitants). Her room, however, was classic California hippie. Posters of Marley, Hendrix, and Dylan covered the walls. Incense hung thickly in the air.

The Dalai Lama cast a beatific gaze over the night’s opening ceremonies from his perch above a desk.

“Thank you all for coming to my favorite event of the year,” said Sparkletights, who, like the other attendees, wished to keep her real name private (drinking at their age is illegal on this side of Niagara Falls). She wore shimmering red leggings, a white tee, a maple leaf wristband, and war paint.

“Let’s make this biennial… bicentennial…” Sparkletights had started drinking before the other dozen guests arrived, and now searched for the right word. “What’s once a year? …Annual!”

The group then made its way to a tray of red Jell-o shots. Someone had placed tiny toothpick American and Canadian flags in each cup.

“Potent beverage?” a girl in a red bandanna offered.

A girl with a Texas drawl accepted. “Southern conservative family plus underage drinking equals… no good,” she said before downing a shot.

Elsewhere, a young lady with a Canadian flag draped around her shoulders mistakenly picked up a cup marked with a US toothpick.

“Don’t drink from an American cup! What are you doing?” asked her friend, a hockey player.

“I’m annexing territory!” Flag Girl replied.

Everyone then grabbed a can of Natural Light beer and circled up for a round of “Thunderstruck”, a game based on AC/DC’s 1990 song of the same name. As heavy metal blasted from Sparkletights’s laptop, the guests took turns downing beer, switching every time Brian Johnson growled “THUNDERRR”.

Flag Girl, a diminutive pre-med, had the misfortune of being stuck chugging during an endless guitar solo. “Yeah! Whoo! Come on! Come on! I love you! Keep drinking! Keep drinking!” the crowd squealed as Flag Girl pumped her short legs in seeming hopes that her shifting weight would move the beer down quicker.

The second-longest solo fell to a fraternity pledge dressed in a sleeveless undershirt (complete with fake nipple ring) and cargo shorts for a “White Trash” party he planned to attend later that night. Frat Boy coughed, choked, and grimaced as he tried to force down the pale yellow swill. “I can’t do it,” he lamented.

The Canadian contingent quickly claimed victory after Frat Boy’s shocking fumble. But the American delegation refused to concede.

“You can’t spell ‘Canada’ without ‘nada’!,” a young man in a Captain America costume taunted.

As the night progressed, the group moved from drinking to dancing. “Er’body in the club gettin’ tipsy…” proclaimed rapper J-Kwon over the sound system. The partygoers bounced listlessly to the beat. Perhaps the space proved too limiting – cramming more than a dozen young adults into a 130 square foot room is no small feat – or maybe the group had already drunk too much. In any case, repeated calls for a danceoff went unheeded.

A girl stood on the bed. “Public Service Announcement: It’s 9:30. Pace yourselves,” she said.

Miley Ray Cyrus sang an anthem of teen angst as groups of three or four broke off to pay a visit to a bottle of rum. “To blacking out!” they cheered. “To Canada and America!” “To America and Canada!” For a moment, it seemed like ugly international rivalries had met their match in alcohol. Captain Morgan: Distiller, Pirate, Peacemaker.

Frat Boy and Flag Girl stood in a corner, in deep discussion about their relative physiques. “You ain’t got nothin’ on me,” Frat Boy said, pointing to his stomach. “One, Two, Three, times Two, equals Six. Pack.”

But the good feelings ended when the music changed. On came a song from a Molson beer commercial. The Canadians sang boisterously along:

“I know this place is where I am,
No other place is better than,
No matter where I go I am,
Proud to be Canadian!”


Frat Boy looked on, scowling. “There’s a line between loving your country and stupidity,” he said. “This is bordering on stupidity.”

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

UPC ENTERS THE BLOGOSPHERE

Welcome to the beta version of Drink the Ink, the Princeton University Press Club's brand spankin' new contribution to the ever-expanding blogosphere. For now, as the blog remains in its infancy, posts will cover a wide range of topics - we're experimenting with what we want to blog about and what you want to read about. Keep an eye out for political commentary, lexical musings, recesssion-induced grousing, descriptions and discussions of Princetoniana as well as the rest of the Ivies, and national and international news through the eyes of ten intrepid student journalists. Don't forget to drink the ink.